The agent partially understood Auto Inspecto's core function and business model from the homepage and terms of service, but encountered significant rendering failures on the map page and missing foundational documentation (about, pricing, FAQ, how-it-works). The site did not state pricing, lacked product comparison information, and exposed critical platform details only in legal terms rather than product documentation.

• ›Step [0] (homepage) was the only content-bearing discovery source; it contained the core positioning and service description but showed loading errors (zero statistics, 'Завантаження…' messages) that made platform maturity unclear.
• ›Step [2] (terms of service) was the primary source for understanding business model (off-platform payments, basic moderation only, no liability)—information that should appear in product docs, not buried in legal terms.
• ›Step [1] (map page) failed to render, returning only repeated loading messages and no inspector data, making it impossible to validate the service discovery claim or see pricing examples.
• ›The site does not publish pricing, verification criteria, inspection scope, or dispute handling anywhere the agent could access—these gaps required the agent to state 'unknown' or 'not found' rather than construct an answer.
• ›No FAQ, about page, or how-it-works guide was discoverable or linked from the homepage, forcing the agent to rely entirely on homepage framing and legal terms to explain the service.