Agent satisfied the task: it retrieved and synthesized a clear explanation of Revoltaged's business model, target customers, project-based pricing approach, and claimed differentiators from two live pages. The site's English homepage was content-rich but lacked pricing details, case studies, and explicit competitor positioning; the agent acknowledged these gaps honestly rather than filling them from model memory.

• ›Step [0] returned only a language selector with no content, forcing the agent to navigate to /en. This is a friction point: the root domain does not surface the business description directly, requiring an extra hop.
• ›Step [2] (the English homepage) was the primary source for all business substance—services, products, target market, and differentiators. The page exposed this information clearly in structured sections, making it agent-ready.
• ›Step [3] ('How we work') confirmed the intake/discovery engagement model and process steps, but contained no pricing, timeline, or cost estimates. The agent correctly noted these absences rather than inferring them.
• ›The agent explicitly cited sources and acknowledged what it did NOT retrieve (individual product pages, Smart Factory details, Florisoft explanation, case studies), indicating disciplined sourcing and honest boundary-setting.
• ›The site's use of illustrative data in dashboards and TraceMate's dual labeling ('illustrative example' + 'in development') created genuine ambiguity that the agent flagged. This is a UX/clarity issue on the site, not an agent failure.