The agent read the homepage and courses page and found the offering clear, but the site publishes no prices, so it searched third-party sites for pricing and reported conflicting figures. It did not research competitors, so the comparison part of the task went unaddressed, leaving the answer only partially complete.

• ›The homepage and /cursos page were fetchable and gave a clear, well-structured picture of products, audiences, and formats.
• ›No prices, fees, or plans are published on the site, which forced the agent to rely on external, commercially motivated comparison sites for cost.
• ›Format labels and age ranges are inconsistent across courses (e.g. 'Ao Vivo' vs 'Online Ao Vivo', CTRL+PRO 17+ vs CTRL+YOUNG 14–17), reducing clarity.
• ›The 'how it differs from alternatives' part of the task was not researched; competitor claims rest only on the site's self-description.
• ›Third-party price sources disagreed by large margins, so the agent flagged uncertainty rather than giving a firm figure.