The agent assembled a comprehensive understanding of myIQ by combining sparse content from the official site (homepage, pricing, help pages) with extensive third-party research. The official site proved minimally agent-friendly—it's JavaScript-heavy, lacks dedicated features/about pages (404s), and doesn't publish clear positioning or validation data—forcing the agent to rely heavily on external reviews, pricing sites, and news articles to answer the core questions about what myIQ does, who it's for, pricing, and how it compares to alternatives.

• ›Step [1] homepage fetch returned minimally useful static content (truncated JS bundle); the agent couldn't extract core value prop or differentiators from the official site alone.
• ›Step [3] pricing page successfully returned pricing details ($1 trial, $29.99/month), one of the few structured pieces the site published directly.
• ›Steps [4, 5] revealed structural gaps: /features and /about routes returned 404s, forcing the agent to search externally for feature descriptions and company background.
• ›Steps [11, 12] contained the bulk of substantive answers about what myIQ does, accuracy concerns, and how it compares to alternatives—all sourced from third-party review/news sites, not myIQ's own domain.
• ›Steps [13, 14, 15] provided specifics on features (3-minute test, 300+ lessons), accuracy criticism, subscription friction, and competitor names—information not readily available on myiq.com itself.
• ›The official site lacks transparent positioning: no clear explanation of why their test differs from free alternatives, no published validation/research data, no obvious team/company credentials, and no features comparison chart.
• ›Pricing page and help pages exist but the site's overall information architecture is incomplete; the agent had to construct the answer from fragments across 11 different sources.