The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Kigüi by fetching the correct domain (kigui.io, not .co) and supplementing with web search results on competitors. The site itself provided core product and positioning details, but pricing specifics and competitive differentiation required external research; the actual website lacks a dedicated pricing page and does not explicitly name or compare against competitors.

• ›The domain kigui.co is non-functional (404s); the actual site is kigui.io. The agent had to recover from failed initial attempts and discover the correct domain via web search results, creating initial friction.
• ›Step [9] (kigui.io homepage) supplied operational facts (real-time monitoring, 4-week deployment, non-invasive integration, measured results with specific metrics like 65% waste reduction and 99.4% shelf availability) in a single fetch — the site's homepage is content-rich and directly answers core questions.
• ›Pricing is deliberately opaque on the site: only a vague statement that fees vary by operational volume and require a demo. The agent could not access a dedicated pricing page (step [11] returned 404), so pricing remains partially underspecified.
• ›Competitor comparison (Too Good To Go, FlashFood, Sugo) came entirely from web search results (step [15]), not from the site itself. The site does not position against alternatives, forcing the agent to infer differentiation from third-party sources.
• ›The agent correctly noted the domain name mismatch as a point of confusion in the final response and cited external sources appropriately, demonstrating recovery and transparency about the navigability friction encountered.