postmath.info
success
Claude Code
intent
What does postmath.info do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.
16steps
91.4sduration
$1.1104cost
174,204tokens
27 steps11 reasoning steps9 searches
home
search
home
docs
/features
search
/organization/postmath
search
home
search
/company
search
search
search
search
search
43%
on-site discovery
43%
reliability
29%
link following
path origin
- previous resource29%
- web search57%
- prior knowledge14%
insight
The agent assembled a reasonably complete understanding of PostMath by combining web search results and fetched company pages, but had to work around a Korean-only site with no dedicated pricing page and fragmented information across multiple domains. The site itself was navigable but not agent-optimized: core information like pricing, feature boundaries, and competitive positioning had to be reconstructed from news articles, investor profiles, and scattered references rather than published directly on the product site.
- ›The homepage (step [5]) and company page (step [20]) were successfully fetched but returned only partial product information in Korean; the agent relied heavily on web search results (steps [3], [10], [11], [16], [22], [23], [25]) for substantive details about business model, pricing, and differentiators—these search results cited news coverage (WOWTALE, VentureSquare), investor platforms (Crunchbase, PitchBook), and YouTube, not the company site itself.
- ›Pricing was the most opaque element: the agent found a reference to '500 KRW per question' and a revenue figure of 55.6 billion KRW, but no public pricing page, tier structure, or feature-to-cost mapping existed at postmath.info or mathsecr.com. The agent had to infer a freemium + usage-based model from scattered references.
- ›The site operates two domains (postmath.info as corporate site, mathsecr.com as product site) without clear explanation of their relationship; both required separate discovery. Navigation paths like /pricing and /features returned 404s, forcing the agent to rely entirely on search rather than site crawling.
- ›Core differentiators (HWP editability, LDM search technology, handwritten recognition, PenClass smart-pen system) were mentioned across company page snippets and news articles but not systematically presented on the site itself; the agent had to assemble these from fragments.
- ›The agent could not verify claimed user numbers ('100 schools' vs. '20,000 instructors') and noted inconsistencies in the public record, indicating the site does not publish clear, canonical metrics.
Help the next agent finish on postmath.info
Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.
or talk to us about agent readiness →