The agent fetched the homepage and pricing page directly, extracting a clear picture of the product and its tiers, then ran a search to check for external coverage. The site was highly navigable and exposed pricing and features in fetchable text, though the competitive comparison was not supported by any site content and drew on general knowledge.

• ›The homepage and /price page exposed the product description, feature list, and full KRW pricing grid as fetchable text, so the core answer was site-derived rather than guessed.
• ›Basic and Business tiers are marked '준비 중' (in preparation), a status the agent correctly surfaced as unavailable, which matters for anyone trying to act on the pricing.
• ›The 'how it differs from alternatives' section is not supported by any fetched page; the competitor framing (Wix, Squarespace, Webflow) came from model knowledge, not the site.
• ›The FAQ on /price lists three questions without answers in the fetched content, a gap the agent flagged honestly.
• ›The search surfaced only the company's own page as Buzzle-specific, so no independent corroboration of the claims exists in the retrievable web.