Agent satisfied the task: it fetched the homepage and pricing page, extracted clear answers to what WebAutonomos does, who it serves, how it's priced, and how it positions itself against alternatives. The site published this information directly on accessible pages with only moderate inconsistencies (domain renewal terms, revision limits, purchase-plan maintenance responsibilities) that the agent correctly flagged as confusing.

• ›The site presented pricing and positioning clearly on two top-level pages (/precios, homepage) without requiring navigation to buried docs or API calls; the agent reached both by following links or typing the domain from memory.
• ›Core confusion: domain inclusion terms contradicted between header claims ('included') and fine print (first year only, €12/year renewal from year 2). The pricing page resolved this, but the agent had to cross-check.
• ›Revision policy was ambiguous across the site: 'unlimited' before publish, 'one per month' after, with no stated time limit on the monthly allowance or definition of what qualifies as 'bigger changes' requiring a quote.
• ›The 24-month price comparison table contained arithmetic errors (omitting year-2 domain renewal) and blank competitor hours that broke its own calculation logic, forcing the agent to note the totals were unverifiable.
• ›The site offered a demo-first, pay-if-satisfied model prominently, but cancellation and content-ownership terms after purchase were not documented, creating uncertainty about long-term custody and data portability.