The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of the institution by fetching the homepage three times and running a targeted web search. The site itself functions as an admissions funnel rather than an information resource—it provides mission/program overview and scholarship mentions but deliberately withholds pricing details, requiring visitors to contact the institution directly.

• ›The homepage [1,2,3] directly answered what the institution does, who it serves, and what scholarships are available, but contained no actual tuition figures—only percentages ('up to 60% discount') requiring personalized contact.
• ›All core institutional identity (100+ courses, five campuses, faculty credentials, hands-on pedagogy) came from the target domain's homepage; no secondary fetch was needed to answer those parts of the task.
• ›The web search [4] added institutional context (25-year history, current R$50 enrollment promotion, specific course names) but no information that contradicted or substantially deepened what was already on the homepage.
• ›Pricing opacity was a deliberate site design choice, not a retrieval failure—the agent clearly encountered it but correctly flagged it as a gap, noting that personalized quotes require WhatsApp/email outreach.
• ›The agent's differentiation analysis drew directly from site-stated claims (hands-on learning from day one, practitioner faculty, network effects) with no external validation or comparative data, relying on what the institution chose to emphasize.