The agent successfully mapped the site's business model, target audience, product range, and pricing absence by fetching the homepage, About page, and RCA product page. The site is navigable but deliberately vague on prices and broker compensation; the agent identified contradictions and gaps that could not be resolved without deeper exploration or external sources.

• ›The homepage and About page together supply the company structure (TFD + Proximus Broker), ASF registration, and product list, but name no people and do not clarify which entity the customer contracts with — a structural clarity gap the site itself does not resolve.
• ›Pricing is entirely absent from all fetched pages: no premium examples, ranges, or fee schedules. The RCA page describes how quotes are calculated (from insurer rates) but never shows any actual numbers, forcing the agent to note the absence rather than report numbers.
• ›The broker-pay model is contradictory within the site's own content: the About page states consultancy is provided 'without commission' in one section, then says 'the broker is paid by the insurer through commission' in another, leaving the customer's true cost opaque.
• ›The agent did not fetch other product pages, the FAQ, or terms pages, so claims about 'general' FAQ content and missing health-network details are grounded in what the agent chose not to explore, not in site-unavailability — the information may exist elsewhere on the domain.
• ›All three fetched pages are internally consistent in exposing no pricing, no owner names, and no insurer-specific details; the agent correctly attributed these gaps to the site's design rather than to unreachable or truncated content.