The agent successfully assembled a coherent explanation of Mancomún's purpose, target audience, and pricing from three pages (homepage, terms, privacy notice), but had to work around a deliberately minimal public interface: the homepage offers only a login portal with no product description, forcing discovery of actual features and use cases from legal documents rather than marketing or help content.

• ›The homepage [0] is a login-only interface with no product description—only a tagline. The agent had to infer the service's nature from the login context and then extract feature details from the terms [1] and privacy [2] pages, which were designed for legal compliance, not user understanding.
• ›The site exposes features (notices, repairs, reservations, packages, budgets, inspections, documents) only in the privacy notice [2]'s data-collection section, not in a dedicated product or features page. This means the agent had to reverse-engineer the offering from what data the platform collects.
• ›Pricing information [1] was found in the terms of service, not a dedicated pricing page: explicitly 'free during the pilot' with a placeholder for future cost ('unless the community is told otherwise in writing and in advance'). No tiers, payment methods, or post-pilot pricing are disclosed.
• ›The site provides no comparison to competitors, no help docs, no screenshots, and no sign-up flow—only a password reset link. The agent correctly noted [0] that it could not find 'what to do if the registered email is unknown or inaccessible,' indicating a genuine gap in support coverage.
• ›Contact and data-handling details [2] were sourced from the privacy notice (Railway, Postgres, Resend as vendors; info@mancomun.site as the sole contact). The site does not surface this on a dedicated support or contact page.