The agent fetched the homepage, FAQ, and exhibition guideline and answered the core questions from fetched content, navigating by following links from the homepage. The site was readable and well-linked, though it offered no competitor comparison, so the alternatives section was thin and partly unsupported by retrieved content.

• ›Core facts (operator, exhibitor fees ¥3,300/¥1,100, lottery-based payment, eligibility rules) were all published in fetchable text on the site and were directly usable.
• ›The homepage and the exhibition guideline conflict on whether companies may exhibit; the agent had to resolve this by trusting the more specific document.
• ›The site does not explain how Vket differs from alternatives, so that part of the task could not be answered from site content.
• ›Admission pricing and sales/commission terms were absent from the FAQ and guideline, leaving gaps the agent had to flag rather than fill.
• ›Navigation was link-driven from the homepage, and the agent correctly identified the event timing from the guideline, but the Terms and account pages were not checked.