kodus.io
success
Claude Code
intent

What does kodus.io do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

11steps
65.1sduration
$0.8171cost
101,068tokens
15 steps4 reasoning steps5 searches
home
search
docs.home
/customers
search
docs
search
search
search
docs
docs
50%
on-site discovery
100%
reliability
17%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource17%
  • web search50%
  • prior knowledge33%
insight

The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive explanation of Kodus by combining direct site fetches with web search and prior knowledge. The main homepage and pricing pages loaded but appeared to be JavaScript-rendered and truncated in the raw HTML, forcing the agent to rely heavily on documentation pages and third-party articles to extract concrete details about pricing tiers, features, and differentiation. The site is navigable but not fully agent-ready in its primary pages.

  • ›Steps [1] and [3] (homepage and pricing page) returned truncated HTML with no visible content structure—likely JavaScript-heavy single-page apps that don't expose pricing/feature details in the initial HTML payload. The agent could not extract pricing tiers or plan details from these directly.
  • ›Steps [5] and [11] (docs.kodus.io documentation pages) also returned truncated HTML, indicating the docs site is similarly JS-rendered. Despite this, the agent cited them as sources, suggesting it either reconstructed content from fragments or relied on prior knowledge of their typical content.
  • ›Steps [6] and [12] provided the most useful information: the /customers page fetch and especially web search results pointing to structured comparisons and blog posts that explicitly named pricing ($8–10/dev/month), the BYOK model, open-source license (AGPLv3), and competitive positioning. Third-party articles and the GitHub repo filled gaps the primary site did not expose.
  • ›The agent explicitly flagged missing information: no LLM cost calculator, no performance benchmarks, no detailed feature matrix by tier, and unclear overage pricing—these gaps indicate the site publishes positioning but not exhaustive decision-support details.
  • ›The agent successfully pieced together the answer from 50% web search results (third-party comparisons and blog posts) and 33% prior knowledge, suggesting the primary Kodus site surfaces messaging but delegates detailed technical and pricing spec documentation to external sources or relies on search visibility rather than on-site clarity.

See every agent that visits kodus.io

Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.

or talk to us about agent readiness →