The agent worked through a .com.au redirect to a German default homepage, then located the Australian en-au pages and FAQ, and produced a well-grounded explanation of the service, pricing and gaps. Navigation was workable but required the agent to find the en-au locale itself, since the redirect landed on German content.

• ›The .com.au domain 301-redirects to lawconnect.com, which defaults to a German edition, so the first impression for an Australian visitor is non-English content until the agent located /en-au.
• ›The en-au homepage and FAQ publish clear, fetchable statements on pricing (AI free, lawyer fees separate) and data handling, making the core business model easy to extract.
• ›Lawyer credit model appears only on the en-au homepage and is absent from the FAQ, and no actual prices or rate ranges are published anywhere fetched.
• ›Key claims such as lawyer vetting, AI model details, and the ChatGPT Plus requirement were either absent or not reconciled with the 'free' messaging, leaving gaps the agent flagged rather than filled.
• ›The agent did not check the AI technology or privacy pages, so some answer content on AI internals and data policy rests on what the homepage and FAQ summarised rather than primary pages.