The agent read the homepage, which carried most of the product, pricing and positioning content, then checked /soporte and found no FAQ, so the Android claim could not be verified. It produced a useful explanation but left several gaps (Latin American pricing, Pro limits, security detail, company identity) unresolved and did not fetch the privacy or terms pages.

• ›The homepage exposed the core product description, Spain pricing, and feature list in fetchable text, making the basic explanation straightforward.
• ›The site's own FAQ claim about Android was not present on /soporte, a discoverability/consistency gap that left a fact unverifiable.
• ›Security and data-storage claims are marketing-level only; the detailed policy lives on /privacy and /terms, which were not followed.
• ›Company identity (legal entity, location, team) and pricing for Latin America are absent from every page the agent reached.
• ›Sample financial figures on the homepage are unlabelled illustrations, which could mislead a reader.