The agent successfully retrieved and synthesized enough information to explain the landing page's claims about Zati's PI law firm offering, but the site itself is deliberately vague—much copy is aspirational, integrations are unnamed, pricing is absent, and availability status is unclear. The agent had to flag substantial gaps rather than fill them from memory.

• ›Step [0] (injury-law-firms.zati.run) is the only content-bearing page for the specific product claim; step [1] (zati.run/) is the parent domain but does not clarify or contradict the vertical page—it's just as vague and generic ('Let Zati run it when you can't'). Both are cited as sources.
• ›The landing page uses aspirational language ('is designed to,' 'is intended to,' 'could') throughout, making it impossible to determine which features are shipped vs. planned. The agent correctly flagged this as a core uncertainty.
• ›No integrations, security details, compliance (HIPAA for medical records), or customer evidence are published on either page. The agent had to note these absences rather than infer them.
• ›The only call-to-action is a Calendly link, signaling early-stage positioning (sales conversation only, not self-serve signup or pricing table). The site does not surface whether a product is live, in beta, or in development.
• ›The agent correctly noted that the parent domain (zati.run) describes a broader 'let others continue your work' product, but the vertical page does not explain the relationship or show how the generic tool maps to PI workflows—a navigation gap that required both pages to be fetched and compared.